The growing threat of quantum computing suggests that Ethereum’s security may soon be tested. While no quantum machines can crack current cryptographic foundations, the Ethereum community is not standing idly by. Key developers are outlining plans to bolster the network’s defenses against potential quantum incursions.
In a proactive move, Ethereum researcher Justin Drake has introduced a proposal dubbed “Lean Ethereum,” which focuses on making the network simpler and quantum-resistant. The initiative addresses the consensus layer, the data layer, and the execution layer to ensure comprehensive protection.
Drake’s strategy incorporates the use of zero-knowledge virtual machines (ZK-VMs) to secure the execution layer. These machines are designed to verify data on-chain without revealing the details behind the information, thus maintaining privacy while enhancing security.
Additionally, his proposal includes data availability sampling, a method that allows nodes to verify small, random portions of data from blocks rather than downloading entire blocks. This not only alleviates storage burdens but also ensures the integrity of block data.
Furthermore, Drake advocates for adopting a RISC-V framework for the consensus layer, which utilizes a simplified instruction set. This change is aimed at minimizing potential attack vectors and vulnerabilities that could be exploited by emerging quantum technologies.
Drake’s proposal is a response to long-standing criticisms regarding Ethereum’s complexity, with an emphasis on reducing technical intricacies while simultaneously addressing quantum security issues.
Buterin’s Strategic Roadmap
Separately, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has unveiled his own roadmap on social media, pinpointing four specific areas within the network that are vulnerable to quantum threats.
Now, the quantum resistance roadmap.
Today, four things in Ethereum are quantum-vulnerable:
* consensus-layer BLS signatures
* data availability (KZG commitments+proofs)
* EOA signatures (ECDSA)
* Application-layer ZK proofs (KZG or groth16)
We can tackle these step by step:…
— vitalik.eth (@VitalikButerin) February 26, 2026
Buterin’s first focus is on validator signatures, which currently use BLS signatures. His recommendation is to transition to hash-based signatures, a change that would be safer against quantum attacks.
Next, there is the data availability structure which relies on KZG commitments. Buterin suggests that while replacing these with quantum-resistant alternatives is achievable, it will necessitate substantial engineering efforts.
Moreover, Buterin highlights the need to upgrade wallet signatures, currently dependent on a single standard format. He proposes the Ethereum Improvement Proposal (EIP) 8141, which would allow users to shift towards quantum-safe signatures.
Lastly, zero-knowledge proofs, critical for numerous privacy applications and Layer-2 networks, also need attention as their quantum-resistant versions are currently more demanding resource-wise to validate.
Moreover, a feature of EIP-8141, referred to as “validation frames,” could streamline processes by aggregating signatures and proofs into single compressed units, thereby simplifying blockchain checks.
Industry Insights
Vitalik Buterin previously advocated for the simplification of Ethereum’s architecture to align more closely with the streamlined design of Bitcoin. In his view, excessive complexity has led to security liabilities and inflated research costs.
In a parallel initiative, XinXin Fan, head of cryptography at IoTeX, has proposed utilizing hash-based zero-knowledge proofs, aiming to secure the entire network without compromising user experience.
In response to the increasing significance of these issues, the Ethereum Foundation has established a specialized post-quantum research team tasked with investigating and addressing vulnerabilities as quantum technology continues to advance.
Buterin’s roadmap, shared on February 26, 2026, came on the heels of this team’s formation, marking a significant step in Ethereum’s evolution toward a more robust quantum-resistant future.